“Character is like a tree and reputation like its shadow. The shadow is what we think of it; the tree is the real thing.” This analogy, spoken by President Abraham Lincoln in the late 1800s has been adopted and used for decades. I believe it is an important distinction – are your actions reflective of your character, or are you letting others’ narrative of you (or possibly your own narrative of yourself) distract your attention? Character and reputation can be two very different things.

Reflecting on the current political and societal climate, it seems that too many are more concerned about their reputation rather than their character. It is easy to overstate credentials, frame stances in a way that seem reasonable, or repeat a narrative until it feels true. It is much harder to act with integrity when the matter may not be popular, does not advance your status, “trend” the right way, or would poll poorly. In a world where so much is consumed or “known” online, one’s reputation can be cultivated, manipulated, or simply invented. When followers and connections do not know the real person, their character, how does one discern what is merely a façade versus the actual substance of the individual?

A clock. It may be digital or analog. Its mechanisms may be mechanical, quartz, or atomic. A clock could conjure a memory of the grandfather or cuckoo clock in your parents’ home passed down through generations. It could also evoke the image of digital alarm clocks from the 1980s and 90s when the piercing alarm woke you up in the morning. For Generation Alpha, a smart clock or the display on their iPhone or Apple watch may be what leaps to the center of their mind’s eye. And yet, some clocks may be more metaphorical in nature.

As another year turns over, some see the clock as re-setting. As the symbolic ball drops on New Year’s Eve, it offers an opportunity to start fresh, change behaviors, or embark on a new lease on life. For others, it may be a marker that time simply drags on, changing the numbers on a calendar. This perspective, we would imagine, depends much on your outlook on life. And for some, particularly those at the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, the metaphorical clock means something much bleaker. The Bulletin is a non-profit organization founded in 1949, which “equips the public, policymakers, and scientists with the information needed to reduce man-made threats to our existence” (Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, n.d., para 1). The most interesting, and probably most well-known, aspect of this organization is their “Doomsday Clock.”

“If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called research, would it?”- Albert Einstein.

Read More

Read More

Jeri Milstead, PhD, RN, NEA-BC, FAAN

Read More

Debra A. Toney, PhD, RN, FAAN President, National Coalition of Ethnic Minority Nurse Associations

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2024.102156

On April 18, 1959, Reverend Martin Luther King Jr. stated during his speech on the March for Integrated Schools, "Make a career of humanity. Commit yourself to the noble struggle for equal rights. You will make a better person of yourself, a greater nation of your country, and a finer world to live in." At a time in our nation where seven state legislative proposals to ban Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives or programs in their educational systems have passed into law and 52 pieces of legislation have been introduced in 23 states with similar type restrictions since 2023 (Chronical Staff, 2024), one cannot help but wonder if 2024 will continue to reverse the efforts great champions like Martin Luther King, Jr. worked so hard to achieve.

Linda D. Scott, PhD, RN, NEA-BC, FNAP, FAAN

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2024.102109

Milestone anniversaries, important decisions, or momentous occasions seem to be key drivers for individuals and organizations to begin reflecting on their past. As is the case with the American Academy of Nursing’s (Academy’s) 50th year, the organization had the opportunity to reflect by capturing stories and celebrating a truly remarkable history of advancing health policy through the generation, synthesis, and dissemination of nursing knowledge. And therein lies the purpose of the Academy, the dissemination of nursing knowledge. To that end, many would argue that dissemination alone is not enough; we must measure the impact of our dissemination. A sentiment that many leaders drive home is that action without impact does not produce results. However, every action, no matter the size, does have an impact. Look no further than Sir Isaac Newton's third law that “for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.” They may present as big waves of change that usher in new policy or as tiny ripples that allow an individual to be heard because a difficult conversation occurred. The Academy’s actions span the full spectrum, and the question that must be answered is how do we value, and digest, each of those reactions?