News & Press

American Academy of Nursing Response to Removal of National Science Board Members

Fri, 8 May 2026 19:56:00 GMT

The American Academy of Nursing (Academy) expresses deep concern about the recent removal of all members of the National Science Board (NSB).

The NSB was established to provide oversight and act as an independent entity that advises on federal policy by setting priorities and creating guidance for the National Science Foundation. This structure has been pivotal in advancing the United States’ scientific enterprise and solidifying the nation's status as a trusted leader on the global stage.

At a time when NSF is already experiencing strain from current and proposed funding cuts, abruptly dismissing the NSB’s 24 members further reduces the NSF’s ability to advance the necessary science that is so highly regarded throughout the world. Given that the NSB was mandated by Congress through the National Science Foundation Act of 1950, the Academy calls on Congress to exercise its oversight and uphold the intent of the law, particularly in relation to the terms of the Board’s members. The Academy stands with our science partners who aim to elevate the United States’ economic and research competitiveness, which is championed because of our established processes for rigor and independence.

AAN Responds to the Department of Education’s Final Rule on the Definition of a Professional Degree

Fri, 1 May 2026 16:35:00 GMT

Washington, DC (May 1, 2026) — The American Academy of Nursing (Academy) strongly disagrees with the Department of Education's (Department) decision to exclude graduate nursing programs from its definition of professional degree in the final rule, Reimagining and Improving Student Education – Federal Student Loan Program Final Regulations. The Academy believes the Department failed to adequately account for the significant impact this exclusion will have on health care in the United States.

The Academy does not stand alone in this position. Alongside other nursing organizations, leadership bodies, and policymakers, the Academy has been consistent in its call that nursing's inclusion as a professional degree is vital to furthering and sustaining access to high-quality health care. The associated loan limitations of the Department’s decision have the potential to undermine and exacerbate demands for exceptional nursing care in every corner of the country and in every setting. In response to the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, the Academy submitted formal comments to the Department demonstrating that nursing is a distinct scientific discipline governed by rigorous licensing, educational, and certification requirements—criteria that clearly qualify it as a professional degree.

The Department received 80,793 comments on the proposed regulations, including substantial feedback specifically addressing nursing’s exclusion. Despite this considerable public response—and the Department’s own acknowledgment that post-baccalaureate nursing programs meet the criteria of a professional degree—it nonetheless retained its original definition of professional degrees in the final rule. The Academy stands with our colleagues in other health professions—including physician associates, physical therapists, and audiologists—who have similarly been omitted from the final rule and have called for its correction.

The practical consequences of this decision are significant and extend well beyond regulatory classification. Effective July 1, 2026, annual federal loan limits for new borrowers will be capped at $20,500 for graduate students (with a $100,000 aggregate limit) and $50,000 for professional students (with a $200,000 aggregate limit). This discrepancy will directly and disproportionately burden students pursuing graduate nursing degrees. The financial impact will be immediate and disadvantage graduate nursing students in relation to other health professions.

The Academy remains steadfast in our collaboration with other nursing organizations, policymakers, and our interprofessional partners to provide expertise and develop solutions that support nurses pursuing graduate education. Ultimately, the focus must be on the patient. Without loan limits extended to graduate-educated health care professionals, the nation’s ability to ensure positive health care outcomes remains fragile. The Academy will continue to seek a resolution that rectifies this decision.

###

About the American Academy of Nursing

The American Academy of Nursing serves the public by advancing health policy and practice through the generation, synthesis, and dissemination of nursing knowledge. Academy Fellows are inducted into the organization for their extraordinary contributions to improve health locally and globally. With more than 3,300 Fellows, the Academy—an honorific society and policy organization—represents nursing’s most accomplished leaders in policy, research, administration, practice, and academia.

Contact

Caroline Kane | 202-777-1170 | ckane@aannet.org

American Academy of Nursing Releases Report on Transforming Health and Healthcare

Tue, 28 Apr 2026 19:19:00 GMT

Core Factors and Aligned Attributes of Nurse-Led Models of Care

Washington, DC (April 28, 2026) — The American Academy of Nursing (Academy) has released a report, Transforming Health and Healthcare: Core Factors and Aligned Attributes of Nurse-Led Models of Care.

With more than 3,300 Fellows, the Academy—an honorific society and policy organization—represents nursing’s most accomplished leaders in policy, research, administration, practice, and academia. Collectively, with our Fellows and partners, the Academy aims to create solutions that matter, inspire change that propels transformation, and envision a healthier future for all people.

The Academy reaffirms its support in the development, testing, and implementation of Nurse-Led Models of Care (NL-MOC). The Task Force concluded that NL-MOC serves as a care improvement model and demonstrates positive clinical and financial outcomes, while simultaneously improving quality and equitable care. Further, the Task Force identified four core factors and four aligned attributes (listed below) that are integral to the success of the NL-MOC.

Core Factors of NL-MOC:

Patient-Centered
Evidence in Practice
Team-based Care Coordination
Outcomes Driven

Aligned Attributes of NL-MOC:

Affirming Culture
Digital Health Innovation
Resource-Minded
Value and Incentive Systems

As the Academy's work in this space continues, the Task Force outlined the policy barriers that must be addressed to fully realize the potential of NL-MOCs now and in the future.

Read Executive Summary

Read Full Report

This report was developed by the Academy’s Models of Care Taskforce:

Kathleen Chavanu Gorman, MSN, RN, FAAN (Chair)
Billie Lynn Allard, MS, RN, FAONL, FAAN
Joyce Batcheller, DNP, RN, NEA-BC, FAONL, FAAN
Sean Clarke, PhD, RN, FAAN
Karen Drenkard, PhD, RN, NEA-BC, FAAN
Mattia Gilmartin, PhD, RN, FAAN
Susan Hassmiller, PhD, RN, FAAN
Anne Pohnert, DNP, RN, FNP-BC, FAAN
Laura Reichhardt, MS, APRN, AGPCNP-BC, FAAN
Hussein Tahan, PhD, MS, RN, FCM, FAAN
Courtney Vose, DNP, MBA, RN, APRN, NEA-BC, FAAN
Ellen-Marie Whelan, PhD, CRNP, FAAN
Susan Grant, DNP, RN, NEA-BC, FAAN (Board Liaison)

This report was approved by the Board of Directors in February 2026. For questions related to this report, please contact Christine Murphy, Chief Policy Officer, at cmurphy@AANnet.org.

American Academy of Nursing Response to FY 2027 President's Budget

Fri, 3 Apr 2026 15:17:00 GMT

The American Academy of Nursing (Academy) is steadfast in its vision of healthy lives for all people and raises its concern over the President's fiscal year (FY) 2027 budget request released today. The proposed funding levels threaten multiple areas of health and health care delivery. While increasing some funding levels that would bolster access to care, for example, a 9% ($11.5 billion) increase for the Department of Veterans Affairs, the budget also outlines many significant cuts to federal programs and agencies that are vital to the nation’s health and the continued strength of the biomedical research enterprise. A 12.5% ($15.8 billion) cut is proposed for the Department of Health and Human Services overall, with a 12.3% ($5.7 billion) cut to the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Though the Academy is pleased that the Administration proposes to retain most of the NIH’s Institutes and Centers, including the National Institute of Nursing Research, the proposed elimination of the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities and the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health is concerning. Other significant concerns include a $129 million cut to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; a $356 million cut to the Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response; and a $4.6 billion cut to the Environmental Protection Agency, representing a 52% budgetary decrease.

The Academy will continue to outline its feedback to Congress as the FY 2027 appropriations process advances and stands ready to work with policymakers to prioritize health for all.

American Academy of Nursing Responds to Department of Education’s Proposed Rule

Mon, 2 Mar 2026 21:53:00 GMT

The American Academy of Nursing (Academy) submitted comments today in response to the Department of Education’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that outlines proposed changes to federal student loan provisions for post-baccalaureate degrees. The proposed rule excludes graduate nursing degrees from the list of recognized professional degrees.

The Academy’s response underscores that nursing is a scientific discipline that is foundational to improved and optimal patient outcomes; that nurses are vital within the health care system to ensure access to timely and equitable health care; and that nurses with post-baccalaureate education have licensing, educational, and certifying requirements that make this a distinct professional degree. Placing limits on the amount of federal loans available to students pursuing post-baccalaureate, graduate nursing education at the master’s or doctoral level would not only negatively impact the evidence-based care Americans receive but also hinder the growth of the nursing profession, constrain the scientific workforce, and ultimately undermine the future of accessible, high-quality health care delivery.

“Nurses are highly-educated, skilled professionals that drive evidence-based practice and meet essential health care needs,” said American Academy of Nursing President Debra J. Barksdale, PhD, FNP-BC, FAANP, ANEF, FAAN. “It is vital that the Department of Education recognize the dire implications of capping federal student loans for graduate nursing education, and instead change course to invest in the profession. The value of nurses in sustaining the health and well-being of patients and families across the country is truly immeasurable.”

In addition to submitting comments as a vested national organization, the Academy has shared resources to encourage a robust response from leaders within the profession to highlight the adverse impact this would have on the future of patient care and the economic realities for students and schools of nursing.

The Academy has worked with our colleagues both within and outside the profession to share our concerns with the Department of Education regarding the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. Professional societies, members of Congress, and leaders within health care have been strong and vocal nursing champions since this issue first arose. The Academy continues to be grateful for their support and partnership to advance a positive resolution.

American Academy of Nursing Response to Federal Enforcement Tactics as a Public Health Concern

Mon, 26 Jan 2026 20:23:00 GMT

The American Academy of Nursing (Academy) has been on record that a public health approach to addressing the causes and risk factors leading to violence is necessary to safeguard the health of the nation.¹The shocking and tragic events that have occurred over the last month in Minnesota involving federal law enforcement agents have left communities fearful and distraught over their safety, security, welfare, and lives.

While full and unencumbered investigations into these actions must occur, the reports, reputable journalistic coverage, and footage captured by members of the public appear to depict extreme force resulting in the death of two American citizens in Minnesota. In addition, there are documented examples where federal agents have upended safety in “sensitive locations” like hospitals and schools.^2,3 Minnesota residents are not the only ones who have been harmed as a result of federal law enforcement tactics. It cannot be more greatly underscored that the actions of federal agents have created an environment across the United States where mental health and well-being are in an increasingly fragile state and the delivery of health care is being negatively affected.⁴

From adverse childhood experiences, toxic stress, and trauma,^5,6,7 there is substantial evidence showing the negative effects on adults, children, and families who have experienced crisis. Communities must be protected and given appropriate support and resources for the short and long-term effects of violence. In light of these deeply concerning incidents, an investigation into the policies and structures that have led to these events must occur to allow for policy change that does not jeopardize public health outcomes.

The Academy calls upon the United States Senate to address these concerns by holding vital negotiations on the Department of Homeland Security funding bill to ensure accountability and establish clear guardrails on how federal immigration officers carry out enforcement operations to uphold human dignity, health, and safety. These negotiations should be done separately and not at the expense and passage of other bipartisan appropriations bills, particularly the Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education Appropriations bill, as funding for health and health care programs cannot be delayed.

With leading experts in trauma-informed care, public health, and crisis management, the Academy urges Congress and the Administration to seek the expertise and experience of professional nurses and nurse scientists who can articulate the detrimental and enduring impact of external actions on the psychological, social, and economic stability of communities.
_____________________

Sources:

1. American Academy of Nursing. (2022). American Academy of Nursing Statement on Firearm Safety and Violence Prevention. https://aannet.org/page/firearm-safety-violence-prevention.

2. Barna, M. (2025, November 5). As the U.S. crackdown on immigrants escalates, public health responds. APHA. https://www.apha.org/publications/public-health-newswire/public-health-newswire/articles/as-the-us-crackdown-on-immigrants-escalates-public-health-responds.

3. Pillai, D. (2026, January 22). Health Care Providers warn of impacts of increased ice presence at Health Care Facilities.KFF. https://www.kff.org/quick-take/health-care-providers-warn-of-impacts-of-increased-ice-presence-at-health-care-facilities/.

4. Ibid.

5. American Academy of Nursing. (2023). Meeting's Proceedings: Finding Gain in the Losses: Strategic Solutions to the Mental and Behavioral Health Crisis in Children and Youth. https://aannet.org/page/finding-gain-in-the-losses-2022.

6. American Public Health Association. (2018, November 12). Violence is a Public Health Issue: Public Health is Essential to Understanding and Treating Violence. APHA. https://www.apha.org/policy-and-advocacy/public-health-policy-briefs/policy-database/2019/01/28/violence-is-a-public-health-issue.

7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2025, September 24). About Adverse Childhood Experiences. CDC. https://www.cdc.gov/aces/about/index.html.

###

About the American Academy of Nursing
The American Academy of Nursing serves the public by advancing health policy and practice through the generation, synthesis, and dissemination of nursing knowledge. Academy Fellows are inducted into the organization for their extraordinary contributions to improve health locally and globally. With more than 3,400 Fellows, the Academy represents nursing’s most accomplished leaders in policy, research, administration, practice, and academia.

Contact
Caroline Kane | 202-777-1170 | ckane@AANnet.org

Statement on House Extension of Enhanced Premium Tax Credits for Marketplace Coverage

Fri, 9 Jan 2026 17:04:00 GMT

The American Academy of Nursing (Academy) applauds the advancement of legislation to extend the enhanced premium tax credits for Marketplace coverage approved by the House of Representatives last evening with bipartisan support. The Academy is firmly on record in support of extending the enhanced premium tax credits, which were first made available through the Affordable Care Act and expired at the end of 2025. We urge the Senate to swiftly pass this critical bill.

Health care costs and access have consistently remained among the most urgent health-related concerns identified by people living in the United States. Health care coverage available through the Marketplace is essential for many Americans, and enrollment has reached record numbers of 24 million enrollees. More than 90% of Marketplace enrollees received financial assistance through the premium tax credits, and without the tax credits, the cost of premiums is expected to double on average. This legislation is an essential and vital step to promote health and address deepening concerns on health care costs and access in the United States.
_____________________

Sources:
American Academy of Nursing. (2025, February 24). American Academy of Nursing Response to Introduction of the Health Care Affordability Act of 2025 (H.R.247). (2025, February 24). https://cdn.ymaws.com/aannet.org/resource/resmgr/policydocuments/2025policyactions/AAN_HCAA_House.pdf.
Saad, L. & Brenan, M. (2025, December 15). Cost leads Americans’ top-of-mind healthcare concerns. Gallup. https://news.gallup.com/poll/699770/cost-leads-americans-top-mind-healthcare-concerns.aspx.
Lo, J., Levitt, L., Ortaliza, J., & Cox, C. (2025, September 30). ACA marketplace premium payments would more than double on average next year if enhanced premium tax credits expire. KFF. https://www.kff.org/affordable-care-act/aca-marketplace-premium-payments-would-more-than-double-on-average-next-year-if-enhanced-premium-tax-credits-expire/.
Marketplace plan selections with financial assistance: KFF State Health Facts. KFF. (2025, October 21). https://www.kff.org/affordable-care-act/state-indicator/marketplace-plan-selections-by-financial-assistance-status-2/.

Statement on Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices Change to the HBV Vaccine Schedule

Mon, 8 Dec 2025 21:47:00 GMT

The American Academy of Nursing (Academy) has long supported immunization as a critical intervention to reduce the incidence of vaccine-preventable disease and promote healthy lives for all people. Over the past thirty years (1994–2023), routine childhood vaccinations in the United States have prevented approximately 508 million cases of illness, 32 million hospitalizations, and 1.1 million deaths.¹

The Academy is deeply concerned by the decision from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)'s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) to change the hepatitis B (HBV) vaccine schedule, which was released on December 5, 2025. Robust evidence supports giving all infants the hepatitis B vaccine within 24 hours of birth, a strategy that has reduced infant HBV infections by 99% since 1991.² ACIP’s recommendation would replace the universal birth dose with a risk-based approach based on the mother’s HBV status and shared decision making. Essentially, it delays vaccination and there is no new evidence that supports this approach, leaving children unnecessarily vulnerable with an increased risk to infection.

“Immunization is critical for public health promotion and reducing the spread of vaccine-preventable diseases on an individual, community, national, and global level. Changes to vaccination recommendations that are not grounded in science contribute to confusion, fuel vaccination misinformation, and fundamentally undermine trust in medical consensus,” said President Debra Barksdale, PhD, FNP-BC, FAANP, ANEF, FAAN

The Academy previously voiced its concern with the changes to the vaccine schedule advanced by the ACIP at its September meeting. The Academy will continue to call for evidence-based decision-making regarding vaccine regulation. We urge the CDC to reject ACIP’s vote to delay the hepatitis B vaccine for infants and call on ACIP to reconsider any future actions that would change immunization schedules without strong evidence.
_____________________
[1] Zhou, F., Jatlaoui, T.C., Leidner, A.J., Carter, R.J., Dong, X., Santoli, J.M., Stokley, S., Daskalakis, D.C., & Peacock, G. (2024, August 8). Health and Economic Benefits of Routine Childhood Immunizations in the Era of the Vaccines for Children Program — United States, 1994–2023. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 73:682–685. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7331a2
[2] Ulrich, A. K., Fleming, D. F., Smith, E. A., Anderson, C. J., Stoddart, C. J., Mehr, A. J., Redepenning, S. G., Moat, L. E., Walensky, R. P., Lackritz, E. M., & The Vaccine Integrity Project. (2025). Universal hepatitis B vaccination at birth (By Alumbra Innovations Foundation & Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy (CIDRAP) at the University of Minnesota). https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/sites/default/files/searchable-download/Universal%20Hepatitis%20B%20Vaccination%20at%20Birth%202Dec2025.pdf

AAN Echoes Concerns Regarding Patient Outcomes if Nursing is Not Recognized as a Professional Degree

Mon, 24 Nov 2025 22:14:00 GMT

American Academy of Nursing Echoes Grave Concerns Regarding Patient Outcomes if Nursing is Not Recognized as a Professional Degree

Washington, DC (November 24, 2025) — The American Academy of Nursing (Academy) has closely followed the actions of the Department of Education’s Reimagining and Improving Student Education (RISE) Committee that came to preliminary consensus on a definition for “professional degree programs,” that excludes nursing.

This recommendation, if adopted, could place a dire strain on the health care system related to access and quality of care. First, and foremost, the nursing profession is a scientific discipline that is foundational to improved patient outcomes. Over the decades, nursing innovations have ushered in monumental improvements to how care is provided at the bedside and in the community. To not recognize nursing as a professional degree would be short-sighted and could have long-term implications on the nation’s health.

“The gravity of this proposal, should it move forward, is severe. At a time when the complexity of the health care system continues to grow and costs rise, nurses who are highly-educated, skilled professionals driven by evidence, are essential to meeting the challenges of a rapidly evolving environment,” said Debra J. Barksdale, PhD, FNP-BC, FAANP, ANEF, FAAN, Academy President.

The Academy will be working with our colleagues both within and outside the profession to share our deep concerns with the Department of Education when the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking is released. It will be vital that the Department of Education understands the role of nurses within the health care system, their leadership within it, and the value they bring to patients and families every day. If this definition were written into final regulations, it could establish a harmful precedent that would have far-reaching consequences for not only the growth of the nursing profession, but the future of health care delivery.

###

About the American Academy of Nursing
The American Academy of Nursing serves the public by advancing health policy and practice through the generation, synthesis, and dissemination of nursing knowledge. Academy Fellows are inducted into the organization for their extraordinary contributions to improve health locally and globally. With more than 3,300 Fellows, the Academy represents nursing’s most accomplished leaders in policy, research, administration, practice, and academia.

Contact: Caroline Kane | 202-777-1170 | ckane@AANnet.org

Academy Remains Troubled About the Government Shutdown & its Impact on the Health of Communities

Wed, 15 Oct 2025 22:52:00 GMT

The American Academy of Nursing (Academy) remains troubled about the government shutdown and its impact on our communities, vital federal programs, and the federal employees administering them. While we would like to see the shutdown end as soon as possible, we are equally concerned about the critical policy issues that impact access to health care in the United States.

The Academy is on record supporting the extension of the ACA tax credits, which is currently being debated. These credits must be extended to maintain access and provide coverage for cost-effective health care at a time when monthly premiums are significantly increasing and some individuals will lose subsidies entirely.

At the same time we are concerned about reduction in force efforts at agencies such as the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Health Resources and Services Administration, and the Administration for Children and Families as well as the elimination of extensions for key programs such as the Acute Hospital Care at Home initiative and Medicare telehealth services. These are just a few examples of the significant impact of the shutdown on the American public.

“Addressing affordable health care coverage is just as critical as funding vital federal health programs. They are interconnected, and Congress has the ability to resolve both simultaneously. The Academy’s vision is healthy lives for all people, and we must work with policymakers to see these programs and provisions be protected," said American Academy of Nursing President Linda D. Scott, PhD, RN, NEA-BC, FNAP, FADLN, FAAN.

The Academy calls on Congress to protect health care.

American Academy of Nursing Statement on Proposed Rescissions to Global Health Programs

Fri, 18 Jul 2025 15:11:00 GMT

The American Academy of Nursing (Academy) is alarmed and disappointed by the enactment of the Rescissions Act of 2025 (H.R.4) that includes $9 billion in cuts of which will result in the elimination of $500 million in funding for global health programs. The Academy, whose Fellowship includes nurses representing 47 countries around the globe, is on record supporting the global health infrastructure. Though the legislation outlines the rescissions would not impact programs classified under the umbrella terms of “HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis, Malaria, Nutrition, or Maternal and Child Health,” the Academy is concerned about the lack of information on the specific programs and initiatives to be impacted. As has been reported, for example, it is understood that funding for the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) has been maintained.

Ultimately, it is most concerning that these rescissions will harm the health of all communities. Sending these federal dollars back to the Treasury run counter to global health diplomacy as health crises travel quickly creating a worldwide impact. As such the Academy reaffirms our commitment to our vision of Healthy Lives for All People and will continue to call for funding to support global health programs.

American Academy of Nursing Statement on the Passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

Fri, 4 Jul 2025 23:10:00 GMT

The American Academy of Nursing (Academy) expresses our disappointment by the enactment of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (H.R. 1), which is now signed into law. This legislation will leave millions of Americans without essential health care coverage. As we have consistently stated throughout the legislative process, sections of H.R.1 would seriously harm the health and well-being of individuals, families, and communities across the country.

The Academy’s vision is Healthy Lives for All People and despite the reversal of key and longstanding federal policy, we will continue to advocate for programs that ensure cost-effective, positive health outcomes. This will be achieved by working closely with our partners and policymakers to not only mitigate the impact of provisions within this law but also invest in a future health infrastructure where care, coverage, and access continue to place the patient at its center.

American Academy of Nursing Reiterates Concern Over Changes to Medicaid Coverage and Funding in HR 1

Tue, 1 Jul 2025 21:50:00 GMT

July 1, 2025

The American Academy of Nursing (Academy) reiterates our deep concern for the changes to the Medicaid, CHIP, and SNAP programs as outlined in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (H.R. 1), which passed in the Senate this afternoon. While updated Congressional Budget Office scores are not yet available on the Senate version passed today, their most recently circulated budget reconciliation includes even steeper cuts to Medicaid than the House version—18% larger. As this legislation continues on a path toward enactment, the Academy cannot be more firm in our statement that this will have crippling effects on the health and wellbeing of individuals and the infrastructure that surrounds it.

“From the outset, with the House budget resolution and up to the most recent Senate vote on the bill, the Academy has urged Congress to avoid cuts and protect essential health care coverage for millions of Americans. The Academy remains steadfast in our vision of Healthy Lives for all People. The policy changes proposed will drive down health outcomes, add burden and confusion when implemented, and create further economic, social, and financial insecurity for families and systems,” said Linda D. Scott, PhD, RN, NEA-BC, FADLN, FNAP, FAAN, President, American Academy of Nursing.

The Academy adamantly implores that the House take action to protect essential federal health care programs as the budget reconciliation moves forward for a vote.

American Academy of Nursing Response to Senate Amendments to the One Big Beautiful Bill (H.R. 1)

Mon, 30 Jun 2025 19:26:00 GMT

The American Academy of Nursing (Academy) maintains our immense concern for the changes to the Medicaid, CHIP, and SNAP programs as outlined in the Senate’s amendments to the One Big Beautiful Bill (H.R. 1), which will be voted on this week. The Senate’s reconciliation bill will limit access to vital health care coverage, impose challenging eligibility criteria, add administrative burden to states, and most devastatingly, negatively impact the well-being of millions of people across the United States including children, families, people with disabilities, and older adults who rely on Medicaid for their health care. Moreover, the rural hospital fund, while increased in the Senate legislation to $25 billion, provides little sustainability, with no clear path for long-term support of rural hospitals, community centers, and nursing homes. The Senate also proposes to prohibit the implementation of the nursing home final rule for which the Academy supported a number of provisions so that nursing home residents receive the care they need and deserve. The Academy strongly recommends that the Senate take action to protect essential funding for federal health care programs as the budget reconciliation bill moves through Congress.

Learn More About the Academy's Policy Work

American Academy of Nursing Responds to Supreme Court Decision in United States v. Skrmetti

Wed, 18 Jun 2025 20:30:00 GMT

The American Academy of Nursing (Academy) is deeply concerned by the United States Supreme Court's decision on United States v. Skrmetti. This decision opens the door for other states to enact similar laws that would prevent individuals from accessing life-saving care that is grounded in research. The Academy firmly believes that individual plans of care should be formulated by health care professionals who have the expertise and experience to offer patients, parents, or guardians the necessary evidence-based information to make their health care decisions. The clinician-patient relationship is vital to quality care that is affirming to each person. When laws interfere with this relationship, decision making process, and run counter to documented evidence, health is jeopardized.

The Academy joined a multi-disciplinary group of professional and health care organizations on an amicus brief in the United States v. Skrmetti case to support access to gender-affirming care.

American Academy of Nursing Raises Alarm in Response to the President's FY 2026 Budget Request

Fri, 2 May 2025 21:19:00 GMT

American Academy of Nursing Raises Alarm in Response to the

President's FY 2026 Budget Request
Recommended Spending Cuts to Federal Programs Would Harm the Health of the Nation

Washington, DC (May 2, 2025)—The American Academy of Nursing (Academy) expresses its grave concern over the President's fiscal year (FY) 2026 budget request released today. It outlines many top-line, detrimental cuts to federal programs and agencies that keep the health of our nation and the core of our biomedical and biobehavioral scientific enterprise thriving.

While we await the release of the President’s full budget request, the level of cuts proposed is staggering. Therefore, the Academy must stress again that Congress should firmly reject this funding plan as they develop their FY 2026 appropriations bills and commit to a bipartisan approach that fully invests in the health of the nation.

From research and public health, to workforce development and access to care, seemingly no area of health and health care delivery would be untouched. These recommendations would block innovation, lessen quality of care, and offer a short-sighted view to the importance of federal health care spending.

“The American Academy of Nursing holds a strong vision to achieve healthy lives for all people. This plan runs counter to our work and will reverse progress,” said President Linda D. Scott, PhD, RN, NEA-BC, FADLN, FNAP, FAAN.

The Administration recommends dismantling significant portions of agencies that support the research and science agenda. Close to 40% of the National Institutes of Health’s budget would be cut, which includes the elimination of the National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR) and the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities. It cannot be emphasized enough that eliminating NINR will stymie critical research that creates evidence-based, community-centered solutions. Moreover, NINR is one of the few institutes that blend biomedical and biobehavioral research seeking to improve patient care across the continuum.

Moreover, significant consolidations would be made to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s programs and reduces its budget by 35%. In addition, the National Science Foundation’s budget would be cut by 57%.

From a public health perspective, this plan strips important public health preparedness and mental health programs. Equally important and of major concern is the plan’s recommendation to consolidate workforce development and training programs within the Health Resources and Services Administration. Without a robust pipeline of future clinicians— for which many rely on federal funding to support their desire to work in medically underserved areas—we would anticipate a downstream effect on the health of communities.

“We must consider the full spectrum of care and the full spectrum of patient populations,” said Dr. Scott. “From individuals in rural communities and families living below the poverty line, we cannot jeopardize so many of the programs they rely on. We must take a long-term approach to health. Short-term savings will lead to long-term expenditures. And in the end, poorer quality of health overall.”

The Academy stands ready to work with Congress to prioritize health for all.

###

About the American Academy of Nursing
The American Academy of Nursing serves the public by advancing health policy and practice through the generation, synthesis, and dissemination of nursing knowledge. Academy Fellows are inducted into the organization for their extraordinary contributions to improve health locally and globally. With more than 3,200 Fellows, the Academy represents nursing’s most accomplished leaders in policy, research, administration, practice, and academia.

Contact
Caroline Kane | 202-777-1170 | ckane@AANnet.org

National Nursing Organizations Call for Investments in Health, Research, and the Workforce

Thu, 17 Apr 2025 14:59:00 GMT

National Nursing Organizations Call for Investments in Health, Research, and the Workforce

Proposed HHS Cuts would be Debilitating to Prevention, Treatment, and Access to Care

Washington, DC (April 17, 2025)—On behalf of the American Academy of Nursing, the American Association of Colleges of Nursing, the Friends of the National Institute of Nursing Research, the National League for Nursing, and the Oncology Nursing Society, we are deeply disturbed by the recent news reported by the Washington Post and other outlets that the Trump Administration is proposing devastating budget cuts to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) along with further restructuring of the agencies within HHS. While our organizations recognize that this proposal is not final and still needs to move through processes at the White House and within the Office of Management and Budget, the significance of cutting this vital health department by $40 billion as reported would be catastrophic to America’s health and safety.

Our organizations call on the Trump Administration to recalibrate their thinking of federal budget cuts to HHS and recognize that the health of individuals and communities as well as the economic repercussions would be dire. If HHS’s budget were cut this massively, the ripple effects would impact the longevity of the population. It would impact the health care workforce, the public health infrastructure, community programs, vital research, rural health, and every aspect of health in between. Prevention, treatment, and access to care would be interrupted at every level.

As nursing organizations, we stand to uphold what is core and critical to our profession— placing the patient at the center of our care. We stand in unity to advance health and advocate for innovation, progress, and reform where needed. Of particular concern is the proposed elimination of the National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR), within the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Since its creation 40 years ago, NINR has been federally authorized “to support research and training related to patient care at NIH.”¹ The contributions of nurse scientists and researchers are both significant and enduring. The potential elimination of NINR from NIH would stall important discoveries vital to symptom management for chronic diseases, cutting edge initiatives and interventions, and training programs for nurse scientists; only to name a few. Nursing practice is driven by our science— the science of care— which improves quality, saves lives, reduces costs, and never loses sight of the patients we serve.

The process of reforming HHS needs stakeholder engagement and should be done with careful precision. Our organizations will continue to work with Congress and the Administration to protect federally funded health care programs, research, and the infrastructure that Americans need for better health, well-being, safety, and security.

About the American Academy of Nursing
The American Academy of Nursing (Academy) serves the public by advancing health policy and practice through the generation, synthesis, and dissemination of nursing knowledge. Academy Fellows are inducted into the organization for their extraordinary contributions to improve health locally and globally. With more than 3,200 Fellows, the Academy represents nursing’s most accomplished leaders in policy, research, administration, practice, and academia.

Contact
Caroline Kane | 202-777-1170 | ckane@AANnet.org

About the American Association of Colleges of Nursing
The American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) is the voice for academic nursing representing more than 875 member schools of nursing at public and private institutions nationwide. AACN works to establish quality standards for nursing education; assists schools in implementing those standards; influences the nursing profession to improve health care; and promotes public support for professional nursing education, research, and practice.

Contact
Robert Rosseter | 202-463-6930 | rrosseter@aacnnursing.org

About Friends of the National Institute of Nursing Research
FNINR's mission is to strengthen and magnify NINR’s impact in advancing nursing science.

Contact
Justin Dodge | 859-514-9214 | jdodge@fninr.org

About the National League for Nursing
Dedicated to excellence in nursing, the National League for Nursing (NLN) is the premier organization for nurse faculty and leaders in nursing education. The NLN offers professional development, networking opportunities, testing services, nursing research grants, and public policy initiatives to its nearly 45,000 individual and 1,000 institutional members, comprising nursing education programs across the spectrum of higher education and health care organizations.

Contact
Michael Keaton | 800-669-1656 | mkeaton@nln.org

About the Oncology Nursing Society
ONS is a professional association that represents 100,000 nurses and is the professional home to more than 35,000 members. ONS is committed to promoting excellence in oncology nursing and the transformation of cancer care. Since 1975, ONS has provided a professional community for oncology nurses, developed evidence-based education programs and treatment information, and advocated for patient care, all to improve quality of life and outcomes for patients with cancer and their families.

Contact
Lori Reda | 866-257-4667 | lreda@ons.org

1. NIH Almanac (2023, June 30). National Institute of Nursing Research. https://www.nih.gov/about-nih/what-we-do/nih-almanac/national-institute-nursing-research-ninr

The Academy and AACN Issue Joint Statement on HHS and NIH Restructuring

Thu, 3 Apr 2025 21:49:00 GMT

American Academy of Nursing and American Association of Colleges of Nursing Call for Investing in Nurse Scientists and Researchers Amid Reorganization of the Federal Research Infrastructure

Washington, DC (April 3, 2025)—The American Academy of Nursing (Academy) and the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) implore agency leadership at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and National Institutes of Health (NIH) to prioritize sustainability of the vital federal research infrastructure. We believe it is essential that community partners, scientists, and stakeholders are consulted before new approaches are implemented. Recent actions to restructure HHS have thus far included staff reassignments, program cuts, and potential consolidations, including at NIH, the nation’s leading driver of scientific discovery.

The Academy and AACN are deeply committed to elevating and bolstering the research infrastructure needed to advance breakthrough science, which is essential to saving lives and improving health for all Americans. This infrastructure is sustained by scientists, research staff, support personnel, and students— many of whom are nurses. For decades, nursing science has been instrumental throughout NIH, advancing new ideas, interventions, treatments, and models that directly impact how care is provided at the bedside, in the community, and at home. From the work of senior scientists to traineeships for early career researchers, as well as pre- and post-doctoral students, the impact made by nursing research is far-reaching.

“Science is the cornerstone of health care. Through science, we advance the evidence needed to make progress in improving the quality and longevity of life for patients. This is particularly true when that evidence impacts practice and is implemented by providers, communities, and health systems,” said Academy President Linda D. Scott, PhD, RN, NEA-BC, FADLN, FNAP, FAAN.

“The nexus between nursing education and science is vital as nurse researchers often serve as faculty who prepare the nursing workforce, improve patient outcomes, and increase the overall health of our nation,” said AACN President and CEO Deborah Trautman, PhD, RN, FAAN. “Elevating the number of nurse scientists within the National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR) and NIH is essential as we work to shape a research and healthcare landscape that is innovative, collaborative, and focused on improving population health.”

Nursing science, particularly the science championed by NINR, is the science of care. Its inherent value lies in the fact that care delivery is patient-focused and aimed at restoring and promoting health and well-being, with the fundamental goal of making our nation healthy. From investigating how patients and their caregivers can improve symptom management from chronic disease to identifying specific factors that exacerbate conditions within populations, nursing science develops the evidence needed to inform how care can better reach patients. Nursing science empowers those who provide care and bridges quantitative and qualitative findings at the point of care.

The Academy and AACN believe it is imperative that the nursing science community and organizations representing science have an opportunity to provide input to NIH and share our expertise in a meaningful manner. We are committed to working with the Administration and Congress as we support the invaluable work of nurse scientists and researchers at the National Institute of Nursing Research and throughout NIH. Through collaboration, all science, including nursing science, can continue to thrive so that the health of the public continues to benefit.

###

About the American Academy of Nursing
The American Academy of Nursing (Academy) serves the public by advancing health policy and practice through the generation, synthesis, and dissemination of nursing knowledge. Academy Fellows are inducted into the organization for their extraordinary contributions to improve health locally and globally. With more than 3,200 Fellows, the Academy represents nursing’s most accomplished leaders in policy, research, administration, practice, and academia.

Contact
Caroline Kane | 202-777-1170 | ckane@AANnet.org

About the American Association of Colleges of Nursing
The American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) is the voice for academic nursing representing more than 875 member schools of nursing at public and private institutions nationwide. AACN works to establish quality standards for nursing education; assists schools in implementing those standards; influences the nursing profession to improve health care; and promotes public support for professional nursing education, research, and practice.

Contact
Robert Rosseter | 202-463-6930 | rrosseter@aacnnursing.org

American Academy of Nursing Responds to HHS Restructuring

Fri, 28 Mar 2025 14:25:00 GMT

American Academy of Nursing Responds to HHS Restructuring
Consolidations and Staff Reductions Will Impact Health Across All Populations

Washington, DC (March 28, 2025)—The American Academy of Nursing (Academy) is deeply alarmed by the proposed plans to restructure the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) through the consolidation of key HHS agencies and regional offices.¹ Combining agencies and reducing offices—each of which has distinct and clear directives—may lessen the impact of vital initiatives, research capacity, training programs, communication channels, and in turn, worsen the health and well-being of the nation.

Further, staffing cuts within HHS agencies will greatly limit the operation of critical programs. According to the official HHS notice,¹it outlines an estimated cut of 20,000 personnel, or a 25% reduction. This significant reduction will severely constrain forward momentum of federal activities that impact all facets of health— from workforce development to safety net programs such as Medicare and Medicaid, as well as the public health infrastructure— in both the short and long term.

While the Academy understands the Administration’s goals to remove redundancy and curtail excess government spending, cuts and consolidations of this scale are extremely concerning and potentially dangerous, especially given the rapid pace.

“Restructuring the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and cutting dedicated staff may have devastating unintended consequences,” said Academy President Linda Scott, PhD, RN, NEA-BC, FADLN, FNAP, FAAN. “Without a careful assessment, given the extensive implications of this proposed reorganization, it may severely impact access to health services, innovation in the health care sector, and stability for patients across all ages, demographics, and health statuses. A consolidation of this gravity needs time, resources, and planning to implement.”

The Academy strongly urges the prioritization of health and well-being of all people, which cannot be achieved through massive cuts and consolidations at HHS. At a time when federal actions have already limited research capacity and jeopardized the translation of key findings for health promotion, an intentional approach must be taken to sustain what works and innovate for improvements. As a nation, we must prioritize research and development, community-based programs, and ensure the necessary staff to investigate and communicate important findings to the public.

###

About the American Academy of Nursing
The American Academy of Nursing serves the public by advancing health policy and practice through the generation, synthesis, and dissemination of nursing knowledge. Academy Fellows are inducted into the organization for their extraordinary contributions to improve health locally and globally. With more than 3,200 Fellows, the Academy represents nursing’s most accomplished leaders in policy, research, administration, practice, and academia.

Contact
Caroline Kane | 202-777-1170 | ckane@AANnet.org

¹Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs (ASPA). (2025, March 27). Fact Sheet: HHS’ transformation to make America Healthy again. HHS.gov. https://www.hhs.gov/about/news/hhs-restructuring-doge-fact-sheet.html

American Academy of Nursing Continues to Condemn Gun Violence

Mon, 15 Jul 2024 20:49:00 GMT

The American Academy of Nursing (Academy) strongly condemns the shooting that occurred at former President Donald Trump's rally this weekend, tragically resulting in injury and loss of life.

Nurses often respond to dangerous conditions to provide care for communities. The Academy applauds the emergency personnel and health care providers who responded promptly to this crisis.

For over a decade, the Academy has been on record supporting policies to reduce firearm violence. Firearm violence is an alarming epidemic in the United States and a public health approach to addressing the causes and risk factors is necessary to safeguard the health of the nation. The Academy supports the U.S. Surgeon General's recent declaration of gun violence as a public health crisis and stands ready to work with policymakers to enact policy changes to prevent future tragedies from occurring.

See the full list of the Academy’s recommendations for Firearm Safety and Violence Prevention.

###

About the American Academy of Nursing
The American Academy of Nursing serves the public by advancing health policy through the generation, synthesis, and dissemination of nursing knowledge. Academy Fellows are inducted into the organization for their extraordinary contributions to improve health locally and globally. With more than 3,000 Fellows, the Academy represents nursing’s most accomplished leaders in policy, research, administration, practice, and academia.

American Academy of Nursing’s Response to Supreme Court Dismissal in EMTALA Ruling

Thu, 27 Jun 2024 20:18:00 GMT

Washington, DC (June 27, 2024) - The American Academy of Nursing (Academy) stands in support of equitable access to the full spectrum of sexual and reproductive health care under evidence-based clinical guidelines, including abortion care.¹ Today, the United States Supreme Court dismissed Moyle v. United States and Idaho v. United States. This action will allow women to continue to obtain abortions in medical emergencies in the state of Idaho. However, the Academy is concerned that the dismissal continues to create confusion and uncertainty regarding access to abortion care in medical emergencies and does not impact cases in other states. Moyle v. United States and Idaho v. United States centered around whether the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA, codified in Section 1867 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1395dd) requirement that clinicians provide stabilizing treatment to patients experiencing medical emergencies preempts Idaho state law, which prohibits abortion at all stages of pregnancy with exceptions to prevent death of the pregnant person or in cases of rape and incest reported to law enforcement (Idaho Code § 18-622). Idaho state law does not permit an exception to preserve the health of the pregnant person.

Enacted as federal law in 1986, EMTALA plays a critical role in ensuring that patients across the country have access to essential care during medical emergencies, including abortion if required as a stabilizing intervention for patients experiencing pregnancy complications.² Unfortunately, today’s dismissal allows litigation to continue related to whether abortion care, provided under EMTALA, is permitted in the face of conflicting state laws with strict abortion prohibitions. State laws such as those in Idaho not only severely limit access to abortion care, but also places clinicians in a challenging position as they must risk criminal investigations potentially resulting in imprisonment and loss of their license to provide essential care during medical emergencies.

The Academy is on record calling for protected access to sexual and reproductive health care services.¹ These services are essential and decisions regarding care are private and personal. All individuals should have the ability to make educated decisions in partnership with their health care providers. Health care providers should also be able to make evidence-based care decisions without fear of prosecution and loss of their license. The Academy firmly stands in support of the enforcement of EMTALA and protecting the availability of abortion care as stabilizing treatment as well as calling for the prohibition of policies and legislation that interfere with the patient-provider relationship.¹ The Academy resolves to continue to support strong protections for the full spectrum of sexual and reproductive health services as well as protect the patient-provider relationship in the wake of this decision.
_____________________________

1. American Academy of Nursing. (2024). American Academy of Nursing Statement: Access to Sexual and Reproductive Health Care. https://aannet.org/page/sexual-reproductive-health-position-statement-2024.

2. Overview of the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) and Emergency Abortion Services. (2023, March 21). Congressional Research Service. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF12355.

###

Supreme Court Preserves Access to Mifepristone and Upholds the FDA Drug Approval Process

Thu, 13 Jun 2024 19:27:00 GMT

The American Academy of Nursing (Academy) is on record urging strong protections for the full spectrum of sexual and reproductive health care under evidence-based clinical guidelines, including medicated abortion services.¹ We stand in support of the Supreme Court’s unanimous decision today to dismiss the case U.S. Food and Drug Administration v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine due to lack of legal standing. By rejecting this challenge to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) evidence-based drug approval process, the Supreme Court has preserved access to mifepristone, a drug used in medicated abortion services. Mifepristone was approved by the FDA in 2000 and due to its proven safety and efficacy, it was made available to patients through 10 weeks gestation in 2016 and without an in-person dispensation requirement in 2021.² Today’s Supreme Court decision leaves the availability of mifepristone in place.

Access to mifepristone is essential as medication abortion makes up the majority of abortions performed in the U.S., with 63% of all abortions being medicated abortion in 2023. Furthermore, allowing mifepristone to continue to be available through 10 weeks gestation is key, as on average pregnant people only become aware of their pregnancy at 5.5 weeks.³

The Supreme Court has never before ruled on the scientific bases for FDA approvals and regulations. The Court’s dismissal in this case has avoided a dangerous precedent and has preserved access to a medication essential to the full spectrum of sexual and reproductive health care services, in addition to keeping the FDA’s scientific, independent medication approval and regulation processes in place. The Academy applauds the Supreme Court’s decision and reaffirms our call for strong protections for the full spectrum of sexual and reproductive health services and care.
___________________
1. American Academy of Nursing. (2024). American Academy of Nursing Statement: Access to Sexual and Reproductive Health Care. https://aannet.org/page/sexual-reproductive-health-position-statement-2024.
2. The availability and use of medication abortion. (2024, March 20). KFF. https://www.kff.org/womens-health-policy/fact-sheet/the-availability-and-use-of-medication-abortion/.
3. Branum, A. M., & Ahrens, K. A. (2017). Trends in timing of pregnancy awareness among US women. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 21(4), 715–726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-016-2155-1.

###

Leading Medical Organizations Urge the Supreme Court Not to Weaken EMTALA Protections

Wed, 24 Apr 2024 21:36:00 GMT

Statement Prepared by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and Signed by Other Leading Medical and Health Groups

April 24, 2024—The Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) plays a critical role in ensuring that patients across the country have access to emergency medical care and lifesaving interventions. For pregnant people, abortion may be the lifesaving intervention needed. It is therefore essential that abortion care be covered by the federal protections afforded by EMTALA. We urge the Supreme Court to preserve EMTALA’s protections for emergency abortion care even in states where abortion is otherwise banned or restricted.

Complications associated with pregnancy—whether they arise during pregnancy or are preexisting conditions that worsen during pregnancy—can appear suddenly and progress quickly, leading many individuals to seek care in the emergency setting. Pregnancy complications can take many forms and can compound each other, further complicating a patient’s needs. And even though these complications may not arise from the pregnancy itself—for example, if they are caused by accidents or violence—the physiological stressors of pregnancy can make them more life-threatening.

In many of these emergency situations, the only way to treat or stabilize a patient is to end the pregnancy that is complicating or threatening their health. Because of this, EMTALA’s protections must cover abortion care so that access to lifesaving emergency care does not depend on a person’s zip code.

As organizations representing health care professionals, we understand that not every patient who presents to the emergency room while pregnant will need abortion care. But EMTALA should guarantee that patients experiencing pregnancy complications in the emergency setting are able to get evidence-based care, which includes being counseled fairly and honestly and receiving an abortion if that is the intervention that they need for their health emergency.

Without comprehensive EMTALA protections, the lives of pregnant patients will most certainly be at risk. EMTALA must continue to protect pregnant people just as it protects those who aren’t pregnant.

View Online Version

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists was joined by the following leading medical organizations to release this statement: American Academy of Emergency Medicine, American Academy of Family Physicians, American Academy of Nursing, American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Chest Phsyicians, American College of Emergency Physicians, American College of Nurse-Midwives, American Medical Women's Association, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, American Urogynecologic Society, Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Council of Chairs of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Doctors for America, National Abortion Federation, National Association of Nurse Practitioners in Women's Health, National Society of Genetic Counselors, North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, Nurses for Sexual and Reproductive Health, Reproductive Health Access Project, Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Society of Family Planning, Society of General Internal Medicine, Society of Gynecologic Oncology